As I write this entry I have to tell
you that I have been feeling pretty euphoric of late. I am almost certain that
I am imagining things and this CAN’T really be as good as it is, but it sure
feels that way.
I feel like my woman really LOVES me. I feel that women in
general really enjoy my company. I feel totally overwhelmed with blessings.
This has not always been the case with me and I think the
same could probably be said for most of us who harbor feelings of downright
adulation for females and hold them in higher esteem than we do ourselves.
Much of my life I have of course fantasized about powerful
women and dreamed of having them dominate me. These dreams and fantasies have
obviously been powered by images from movies, TV shows, magazines, and now the
internet.
The dream is always the extreme 24/7 version of male
servitude and female supremacy. I grovel and beg and lick her boots. She (or
better a large group of she’s) in turn snarl at me, heap scorn upon me and whip
my naked and helpless ass.
Amazon Capture And Humiliation - Every REAL Man's DREAM! (Well it's mine so it must be...) |
At different points in my life I attempted to duplicate various parts of this dream as the only possible road to my fulfillment. I asked girl friends to spank me or dominate me in some fashion. Some cooperated for a time. Some had fun with it a few times but after a while it just seemed too weird for them and they distanced themselves from me and we broke up. Most women just thought I was a sicko and things slowly went downhill in our relationships after that. Yet I persevered!
OMG! That is SO SICK! |
For many, many years, I would see a woman and as she 'caught me' looking at her quickly averted my unworthy eyes. I just KNEW that she was thinking "What a creep! He just wants ONE THING! Disgusting men! All he wants is to use me sexually and throw me away! Pig!" Actually the ONE THING I wanted was to fall on my hands and knees and worship her, be taken home by her and made to serve as her slave forever more. But what I thought that they saw was a disgusting macho pervert.
What they probably did see was a guy who was so conflicted that his confidence was zero and seeing this they reacted properly under the circumstances. If I didn't have any confidence in myself then they shouldn't either."Look, if HE thinks he is a pervert, I bet that he is right!"
Yuck! Don't you DARE look at me you worm! |
My attitude is MUCH different and MUCH healthier now. If I get 'caught' looking at a woman, I am already standing tall with my shoulders back and chest out, a light smile on my face and the instant she makes eye contact I flash a little more smile and maybe nod in acknowledgement.
Guys, do NOT ogle women. But don't be ashamed if you make eye contact either! It was my lack of confidence that made them turn away. Now MOST of these women smile back sometimes a little self conscientiously as if to say "That man over their thinks I am pretty! I like that!"
And yes now I don't feel like I am unworthy to look upon women. If it happens and I am confident in my bearing, I now know my place in the universe and I feel very blessed and quite worthy to SERVE and ADORE women in the ways that they like it. Not only do I now feel WORTHY to serve and adore women, I feel that that is one of the reasons I was on Earth in the first place! I dress well. I carry myself well. I open doors for ladies. I pick things up if they happen to drop something. I smile for them. Do my best to be 'cute', and let them know that I respect them and LOVE being in their company.
But back to my fantasy/reality dichotomy - my sexual drive wanted, no it DEMANDED female dominance or it would never be fulfilled. And frankly no female I ever met ever really wanted to do that. None. I was heart sick. I see this lament all the time on line. So many guys want to be submissive yet there seem to be no matching dominant women to take them up on it.
Or are there?
Is true female dominance always a dominatrix in leather or latex who wants to be an aloof majestic bitch all the time, she makes you scrub the floor on your hands and knees for hours every day in the nude and frequently beat your ass with a kitchen spoon or a riding crop? Is that the hallmark of real female power today?
Domestic Female Domination - OUCH! YUM! OUCH! YUM! Tears of Shame! Tears of Ecstasy! |
Can such a relationship really exist and sustain itself?
Or is it more likely that what most of us are actually asking for is a kinky beat my ass and humiliate me part time relationship, where when it is over our Female Dominance dream woman makes us dinner and does the laundry while we watch TV and have a beer? These type of fantasy relationships that only last as long as there is intense kink remind me of porn because you get totally overwhelmed with feelings of love and desire, then once you have climaxed you almost immediately lose interest and move on.
Is this ‘fantasy’ really even possible? Or is it really destined to be a fantasy and nothing more?
If it can never be, then why do so many men feel this tremendous pull to have it happen? Why do so many men fantasize about it their whole lives through?
Maybe just maybe, there IS a realistic solution. Maybe what we are seeing in our dreams and searching for online without ceasing is just a shadow of the reality that can be our newer happier lives. Just maybe what we are dreaming about is an extreme version of what we really seek that IS healthy and happy and wonderful and doable. Since we suppress the thoughts and expressions of female ‘leadership’ or female ‘reverence’ so harshly in our everyday lives (maybe not us specifically but PLENTY of men do in our presence regularly - and I have a quarter that says those who put women down the hardest have some of the MOST VIVID female dominant fantasy lives around!) without even thinking about it that we have ended up creating a leather clad monster to both worship and torment us all of our lives. The more anyone suppresses something the harder it comes back somewhere else.
So my guess is that if there was more female domestic empowerment and a more open and accepting environment for it in our every day lives, the natural instincts to say 'Yes Ma'am' and to do some chores to make her happy, and bring her something to eat or drink, or sit quietly and adoringly and listen to her for hours would simply flow from us without a second thought and the drastic dominant, humiliating fantasies we have would vanish as we were no longer suppressing our dreams and making them stronger.
We read about and see for ourselves examples of modern women’s empowerment throughout society. We see the ladies getting more advanced degrees in college than the guys do. We see them moving up the corporate ladder like never before. Yet we STILL see women, grown women treated like children to be laughed at or have their opinions ignored when they take leadership positions.
We are all familiar with the image of the angry man hating feminist who has had it with us, and frankly I am surprised the number of them is not higher if we are still doing the things we do to them as I imagine we are. Infantilisation is a real issue. Just watch how men treat other men with an opinion and how they treat a woman with just as valid an opinion. The men are generally listened too and the women and scorned. Their ideas are belittled, and they are treated like they are little children to be patronized.
I read a book a few years back by Naomi Wolfe (I believe it was The Beauty Myth - but I may be wrong) about women and power. She said some very interesting things on the subject. We say that girls do not dream about being in control because of the toys they choose and the games they play. Instead of a war plane or a big construction crane, they play with dolls and pretend to be the mommy. Only they pretend to be the VERY BIG Mommy who makes everyone in the family do EXACTLY what mommy wants them to do when and how Mommy wants them to do it!
Ever 'play house' with a little girl and her dolls. Most of them are pretty clear about the roles and they are the ones who make things happen. You are there to 'assist' them. If you break out of the role she has assigned you for the game, you will be 'put straight' in a hurry. And I am talking about four and five year old girls here! They are the boss of play time just like they are the boss in the game they are playing just like the real dream of control of the family they will run one day.
Small Dolls in the Dollhouse, a Princess in a Tiara, and a Pink Pony to ride – 3 symbols of the Power Dreams of Most Girls |
And yes, girls do love horses. They love the big sleek powerful animals that they can get on top of and control. In many ways horses resemble the man who will be in their lives later. The message I got from all this was that girls DO dream about control and about power. It just manifests itself in a different way than what we would expect from boys.
Another good book that I (very secretly) read back in the early 90s was Dr. Nancy Friday's book about Female Sexual Fantasies and how they have changed through the years. She is a clinical psychologist and over the years she wrote that the fantasies of women have grown more and more aggressive and more dominant as their positions in society have become more power wielding. It was titled "Women On Top". With a title like that how could I resist sneaking away with a copy to feed my own submissive fantasy machine!?
FANTASY ALERT START!
I found this book to be SMOKING HOT! While most of the fantasies were not as extreme as men generally have, some of them were SO HOT and SO DOMINANT that I well, uh, well I ENJOYED reading them. That's what it was. I ENJOYED reading them yeah... I found them very educational and sometimes I ENJOY remembering reading them still...
I recall a couple of them distinctly - One was about a woman waiting for a man to come to her place and ask her to marry him. When he arrived she yelled at him for being late. She grabbed him by the ear, bent him over the back of her couch, pulled down his pants and whipped his ass raw with his own belt while he blubbered his hapless apologies to her.
Then because he was not a proper virgin groom (proper virgin male bride?), she dragged him to the bathtub and with scalding hot water and a hard wooden kitchen brush she 'SCRUBBED ALL THOSE OTHER WOMEN RIGHT OUT OF HIS SYSTEM". She burned him with that water and scraped his skin all painfully raw with that brush. After he was reduced to a sobbing, terrified apology machine she put on his ring, took him by the ear to bed and ABUSED him AGAIN in there too!
Uh - Utterly Submissive male BOING! I mean WHERE WAS THIS WOMAN WHEN I WAS LOOKING!!?
Another was about a woman who had bought a male sex slave who had been abused and repeatedly raped with broom handles by his previous female owner and her sadistic friends. She gently restored his health by taking him to all female doctors who all had to inspect his damaged anus over and over again. She held him while he cowered and trembled in fear of them. She gently brought him back to health and settled his fears. But this was all while they both knew that she was preparing him for her own use because he was so pretty, so cute, and so helpless.
Uhhhhh - tender and just a little frightened 'schhhhhwing'!
FANTASY ALERT END!
In the West today we live in a society where men are TOLD to be in control, but it is also a world where women WANT to be in control. And to an extent both are frustrated by the reality of it all.
I have been in a position where everyone was looking for me to lead day in and day out and make all the decisions and not only that but to come up with most of the solutions and drive their implementation as well. This went on non stop for a long period of time. Guess what? I got really tired of it.
I did a bang up job over that time frame I must say, but if that was to be my life 24/7 for the rest of my life, I would die early simply because I wanted too! I am just not that DRIVEN twenty four hours a day!
Now, put yourself in the position of a woman who has never had the reigns of command or has been sneered at or laughed at when she did take command no matter how well she did. I can imagine that she would be pretty pissed off and REALLY want to boss some people around and even take an amount of revenge out on total strangers for it. (HEY! Do you think that I could create a business where women in that position would pay to spank me, and yell at me, and make me apologize really sincerely over and over again? Uh well maybe not. But DAMN that was a sweet idea! "Oh Honey, I KNOW that you don't like to rent me out to these business women to spank me, and degrade me, but we really need the money and I do so want to buy you that new car and... OK yes Honey I'll be on time tonight in getting home! Yes I agree that you can spank me if I'm late again..." - <<Oh My! I do declare! I think I'm getting the vapors!>> )
And frankly have you ever seen a woman who gets to make fun of a man and especially her own husband? THEY LOVE IT! Usually it is all in good fun but they LOVE to make us squirm and they LOVE to make us blush and they LOVE to make us apologize. Really. The ones I know do. Oh they tone it back enough so that she doesn’t really damage the man's ego seriously, but they do it and they do it to the point of making us squirm a little. AND the guys that most women really LOVE to be around are the ones who seem to enjoy their ‘teasing’ too. (As long as he doesn’t go nuts and actually grovel. And as long as he ‘plays along’ with their games and doesn’t get angry about it. As the Buddha would say: "Seek ye the Middle Path".)
Women LOVE to ‘tease’/ ‘play with’ guys. And the stronger and more capable the guy is the more they seem to love it! I can recall seeing JOHN WAYNE movies where this happens. He would be injured or sick or shot and Maureen O’Hara would nurse him back to health. But when he decides that he is OK to leave before he really is healthy, she bosses him around and treats him as if her were her five year old.
Once he realizes how firm she is in her convictions and that she actually IS doing it for his own good, he smartly says “Yes Ma’am!” with a half embarrassed half ‘I am SO in LOVE” smile and she gives him the sternest (yet playful) look, then turns away just BEAMING about how she embarrassed and controlled him. YES! WOMEN LOVE TO BOSS US AROUND in the right settings.
Look Pilgrim, If Mr Macho himself "John Wayne American" can be happy being Pussy Whipped So Can you! So Stop yer belly aching! |
I cannot speak for female fantasies. I have never had one myself. But I would not be surprised if a LARGE number of women DREAM about being able to control one or more men and have them do as she says, without any of the sexual trappings of the whole whips and chains scene of course. This is because while women want to be in control, they also want to feel safe.
A sniveling worm will not make a woman feel safe. Would he stay with her for life? Would she want him to? Would he fight to protect her if it were needed? Would he actually sacrifice for her benefit? She can and probably should have serious doubts about all of this. Would he provide for her if the need arose and she could not? Maybe. But just as likely she is seeing him as just some kind of a weird ‘kinkster’ who would be off to the next bit of fun the minute that she was not fulfilling HIS every want and need.
So if the world is actually populated by a large percentage of men who’s every dream is about being controlled by a woman, and a large percentage of women who actually do dream about controlling men why can’t we all just get together and make each other happy?
Because as I said “I’m not so sure that the men who want female dominance want it for any more than an hour a week and then be waited on by a servile ‘little woman’.” They want the fantasy fulfillment but they don’t want to truly ‘own’ it.
And I am not so sure that the women who have powerful dreams themselves of Liberation and Empowerment really want to take on the full weight of leadership and still enjoy being the beautiful flower that her womanhood has given her as a gift. We tried the model of ‘Women Having It All’ in the 80s. What we got was a bunch of burned out women. Because ‘having it all’ meant DOING IT ALL.
Is It 'Having It All' or 'Doing It All'? |
These forty plus hour a week career women were also coming home to cook and clean every night of the week as well! And while she had changed from average 'house frau' to Wonder Woman, most of the men these women had married had not really changed much from the 1950s model. Yes the family had more money with dual full time incomes but most men were still living in the past couple of decades and didn’t feel the same urge to change things the way that she had.
I think there is a bridge. I think that we can cross it. But it will take work, dedication, and certainly humility on our parts as men. In part 2, I will talk about what I have found to be a way to bridge that divide and find the real happiness and surrender that my soul had always yearned for.
Hi Surrendered Husband,
ReplyDeleteAgain, you’ve hit the nail on the head. Please allow me to offer some thoughts. (Like you, this issue can’t help but pervade my thinking) In general, I don’t think anybody should dismiss recurring fantasies, especially as they become obsessive. They are eruptions from the deep psyche and need to be heeded and implemented in realistic ways in order to be healthy and happy. I think these fantasies to one degree or another are widespread among men in our culture today. Why? Because men can no longer easily play the role of the dominant male in a patriarchal culture. That opens up the possibility of men becoming the object instead of the subject; the dependent one instead of the independent self; the supporter rather than the supported; the receiver of aggression instead of the giver of aggression.
Sexuality is by its nature a polarity. If one’s sexual attachment during childhood does not shift to the “strong father” then who is then left but the strong mother? What is happening everywhere in advanced post-patriarchal culture is that young men are either rejecting the patriarchal pole or finding that, try as they might, they can’t play it. Many young men are withdrawing from relationships with women altogether for this reason. Women are finding the same thing. They are having enormous difficulty in finding many of the old patriarchal male types and when discerning women do find these men, they use them only for sex.
In short, as I see it, having a strong sexual feeling about becoming the help-mate of a strong woman is not an aberration or a sickness. It is simply the outcome of men observing the impossibility of patriarchy. In several generations female dominant relationships will be the new norm. No one will bat an eyelash about a young man wanting to fall in love with a strong confident woman who can be the leader in the relationship and whose pleasure he can serve unselfishly. In the workplace the new male will prefer to play the role of an assistant to women who are professionally more successful than him, have their own sense of direction, and are not afraid to apply it to men. These women will seem incredibly “hot.” In short, I think we are in the midst of a polar shift that is occurring quite rapidly.
The whips and black leather sexual fantasies most of us have should not be rejected as some worthless fantasy, but viewed as psycho-symbolic enactments of that reversal of polarity. When men are no longer able to get pleasure from being the subject and the sexual aggressor, then the polarity shifts quite dramatically. The woman in black leather is simply a symbol of the shift to the female as the sexual aggressor within a culture that does not yet accept this as normal (hence the black). Her aggression is necessary to consolidate the new submissive psyche that men are developing. Men can’t do it alone. They need the strong confident women to humble what is left of the dying patriarchal ego (humiliation fantasies) and allow the new post-patriarchal ego to emerge. If they don’t have a woman in everyday life who is aggressive enough, they find it fantasy. I think that you are doing a wonderful of job of finding realistic ways of finding an outlet for this new post-patriarchal ego you are developing. You and others on this board are path-breakers. I for one am learning a lot from you because of your honesty and candor.
ls
Thank you very much LS.
DeleteYour comments run along my own thought lines and ideas about where we are heading as a society.
For a long time in fact I have been using the name 'The Millennium of Women' to describe these next thousand years (only to myself) as I think about the sexual power shift that is occurring as our economy moves away from physical and dangerous work to more of an 'Information Society' and one based on personal and health care.
In fact I am considering writing an entry by that name 'Welcome to the Millennium of Women'.
I feel honored by your comment that I am one of the ones helping to lead the way into realistic solutions to these problems.
Oh sure I do dream and fantasize about total and eternal Matriarchy where you and I will be treated as cute but mindless bimboys who are only happy when cleaning house, making dinner, or servicing our powerful women!
Well that is probably not going to happen, but I am seeing a shift from the 'old man' to the 'new man' (whoever he will really turn out to be) who will live as more of a 'support spouse' than ever before in myself.
Perhaps this is also a short term aberration as the pendulum begins to swing in the other direction and the truth is that we will oscillate for a long time between a male dominated and a female dominated society.
But even if that is the case, the pendulum has already begun to swing in the ladies favor and I for one and happy to be on board...
SH: I agree with you. The near future will see an intensifying conflict between the dying male-dominated and emerging female-dominated models of female-male relationships. There is a good book I want to recommend to you—The Castration of Oedipus: Psychoanalysis, Postmodernism, and Feminism by J. C. (Joseph) Smith and Carla Ferstman. Here is a short blurb offered by the publisher:
ReplyDeleteThe dialectics of domination and submission are central to Smith and Ferstman's argument. Men and women, they insist, must avoid the temptation to fetishize equality and recognize the roles of domination and submission in the human psyche, or, in Nietzsche's terms, the Will to Power. They argue that the unification of psychoanalysis, postmodernism, and feminism leads us to a shocking conclusion--that women and men cannot move beyond the suffering which so haunts the human condition, unless heterosexual men surrender the power that is causing their misery and affirm life by joyfully accepting domination by women. And women, conversely, must reaffirm their power by rejecting Oedipal genderization and embracing a liberating matriarchal consciousness and a matriphallic sexuality.
This is a difficult book to read because the authors assume the reader is familiar with the disciplinary jargon of psychoanalysis and postmodernism—not to speak of Nietzsche. But, in my view it’s worth trying to struggle through it. By the way, the authors rely on the metaphor you use of the horse being trained, mounted, and ridden by the female rider. They say: “The dressage method training horses furnishes an appropriate metaphor for [women] transforming the Beast-Man into the higher man. Here, the trainer understands fully the psychology of the horse and molds it in terms of that psychology. Eventually the horse anticipates the wishes of the [female] rider so closely that it is often difficult to say who is controlling. In the final analysis, however, the rider is in the saddle.” (278-79)
ls
"They argue that the unification of psychoanalysis, postmodernism, and feminism leads us to a shocking conclusion--that women and men cannot move beyond the suffering which so haunts the human condition, unless heterosexual men surrender the power that is causing their misery and affirm life by joyfully accepting domination by women. And women, conversely, must reaffirm their power by rejecting Oedipal genderization and embracing a liberating matriarchal consciousness and a matriphallic sexuality."
DeleteUPON MY KNEES WITH MY HANDS HELD UPWARD OH GREAT LADIES, FULLY AND FREELY DO I SURRENDER UNTO THEE AND BEG THY TOTAL ETERNAL CONTROL AND LOVING GUIDANCE EVEN THOUGH I WILL NEVER BE WORTHY OF IT!!!!
Excuse me. I didn't mean to get carried away...
I also wanted to note that the pony in the little girls picture is pink, soft, pretty, and EXTREMELY feminine or feminized.
DeleteAlthough the base fantasy is to ride on a big muscular horse and completely control him IN his masculinity, it is a 'safer' fantasy (maybe a side fantasy) to control a pretty pink pony with ribbons in his mane who will always act sweetly and obediently.
This plays into other tween girl fantasies about "Dream Boy Friends" like boy band members. They ARE male, but they are also 'safe' as they have long soft hair, wear 'pretty' clothes, and never act in an overtly masculine and threatening way. Boys their age hate them, girls get dreamy eyes about them.
This may play into the Sissification and Feminization fantasies that play out later in life, because although there aren't many women who profess such desires out openly in society, there certainly are SOME women who dream of feminizing a male (Girls who like boys who like boys...) and the extreme of that would be actual physical castration.
There is for these women the pleasure of the metaphorical castration of having him act and dress in a more feminine manner than almost ANY WOMAN would would ever be caught dead doing.
And obviously there are males who seek this too. Witness the LARGE number of sites that feature Cross Dressed Sissy Maids who submit totally to the will of a very demanding dominatrix.
This certainly represents an erasure of their traditional masculinity.
Yes, the metaphor can be carried further. At least partial feminization of males can be part of the meaning of castration. In fact, I think some level of feminization is virtually inevitable as men refuse to adopt the old patriarchal self-images and put feminine modes of expression on an equal or higher level than masculine modes. I myself am partly feminized in this respect. The image of androgyny or bigender, if you will, is still much more acceptable for women than men because masculinity is still widely understood as superior to femininity (here’s where the feminists have made a big mistake) But, looking at avant garde fashion and art, we can see the polar reversal already making itself felt. Have you seen the male model Andrej Pejic? Pink Pony indeed.
DeleteStill the meaning of it in the book is castration of patriarchal discourse. In that regard, I just love the idea that one hears from Nancy and dennis (“shut up and listen”) and Kathy (in mixed company men should keep silent and speak when spoken to). That is the metaphorical castration that enables the Female subject to develop.
ls
Well Pink Pony #1 is now a lady pony and HAS been officially castrated.
Deletehttp://www.cnn.com/2014/07/25/showbiz/celebrity-news-gossip/andrej-pejic-model-sex-change/index.html
And as the power balance moves more onto the women's side, we will need to think up other 'gentlemanly' and 'polite' terms for the less drastic forms of shall we say "Reduction of male sexual aggression in society" or "Helping the boys to be more welcome in polite society".
I am always willing to dress nicer, walk taller, smile more pleasantly, walk more quietly with more grace, and be more docile in the presence of ladies. But I don't really think of that as 'castration'.
It's more of 'being a gentleman' which is um, well ah 'nicer for the ladies', and I am all for that!
Well, Andrej can no longer be called androgynous—at least to most. I wonder what will become of her modeling career and her fame. I think other male models may take her place as examplars of in-between presentation styles. Making yourself attractive to the ladies is a worthy goal! And your particular way of presenting yourself I hope will be influential with other men as well as with women. I think there are other male styles as well that fit for people like us, and they are emerging like wildflowers all around us,
ReplyDeletels
That's kool.
DeleteLike I always say "This is what is working for me." That doesn't mean that my answer is the only possible answer to the issue at hand.
I once read and I have no idea where, that when society is threatened by physical danger the tough more rugged looking men are the ones who are most in demand as partners by women. But when that threat is lifted, it is the softer and 'prettier' males who are found to be the most desirous.
Made sense to me. If there is danger, look for a protector. But if there isn't well who wouldn't want to go for the prettiest pet on the block?
SH: Yes, I agree with you. Historically, women have become liberated when the following exist: 1) physical security—usually meaning lack of war—so that they don’t have to depend on men; 2) economic security to the extent that they don’t need to rely on men for a living; 3) access to birth control or at least the ability to limit their families; 4) a political system that values equality. When this happens the balance of power shifts to women and away from men. I think all these conditions are now present and this portends good things for the growth of a male matriphallic psyche as men adapt to women’s preferences rather than the other way around. But, another way of putting it is that men have the freedom to move outside the rigid patriarchal gender boxes that free them from exploring different sides of themselves. I think men will actually benefit from being forced to adapt to women’s preferences, because most men are not spontaneously dominant, nor do they want to engage in “king of the hill” type of competition.
ReplyDeleteDon’t you think a lot of men would love to be the pampered pretty pet of a strong women? (I have also read recent evidence that women are attracted to more feminine male faces.) For some it would be a fantasy, but as you know it means men would have to become much more sensitive to women’s sexual needs—a good thing. And that would mean spending much more time on personal grooming, etc.. This is obviously something you are well aware of and already doing. Men’s magazines would begin to publish articles on the 11 ways to please your wife in bed or what looks/hairstyles drive your girlfriend wild or how to be desirable in bed. Your blog is actually a version of this. (have you thought of writing a column for a men’s online journal?) I think there’s a real audience for that. I read somewhere that many women love the sight of a naked man (or least a man) doing housework for them. Have you found that to be the case?
ls
LS -
DeleteI love your notes. They give me so much to think about and both respond to AND base new entries on. This is the fuel that keeps me writing.
<< Don’t you think a lot of men would love to be the pampered pretty pet of a strong women? >>
Oh yes a fantasy for many I am sure. Is for me. Be still my beating heart! But now, today, here, I really don't think that it would turn out so good for me or for she.
<< women are attracted to more feminine male faces...>>
Yes I think this plays into what we were saying. In times of trouble they love rough men. But in times of peace and plenty, why not get a pretty lover?
<>
Oh I'd read the hell out of that, but I would still hide it under the bed like the 2 books I mentioned in the article. These things could happen but I think they would be packaged very differently than ones made to attract women.
<< Your blog is actually a version of this. (have you thought of writing a column for a men’s online journal?) I think there’s a real audience for that. .>>
You flatter me!
But that sounds like a dream job! I would love to be a pamphleteer for 'The Cause'! Just imagine how many ladies could be served and empowered by those efforts and how many sad men trapped in a dual life could achieve joy.
Ah but this is a fantasy too.
Do you have any contacts?
<< I read somewhere that many women love the sight of a naked man (or least a man) doing housework for them. Have you found that to be the case? >>
In the past I have been lucky enough to be admired for my naked body. Nowadays not so much.
And I remember the sexual JOLT my wife got the first time she watched me dust the living room. She stared. She giggled. She commented. Later she 'enjoyed'....
SH
Dear SH: I want to comment on one part of your main post—the example of female teasing as a form of control [and pardon me for using your blog as a place to develop my thinking—if you want me to lay off, just say the word]. As you say, women love it. It is surely a way of women exerting mild aggression—sometimes with sexual intent—toward men but without openly seeming to. Many men will respond defensively to teasing; others will playfully or angrily give back as good as they get. In both cases, men are defending their patriarchal turf and asserting their male prerogatives. Women are searching for chinks in the patriarchal armor with a fine dagger, fearing to use the braod sword because it is not ladylike. But, the goal is the same: to bring the male ego back to earth, which allows women to be on a more equal footing with men and possibly to kindle romance.
ReplyDeleteBut we can move past that? What if men embraced and welcomed the female energy behind the teasing? They could do this by complying with the woman’s unstated wishes, openly and without combating her. Two things would happen. The woman would be encouraged to become more open about using her aggression, and she might escalate it. If sexual attraction was behind the teasing, she would be encouraged to combine her sexuality with aggression. To the degree that occurred the man would be faced with the choice of drawing the line or accepting the further escalation. If he did the latter, we get the possibility of developing “matriphallic” or matriarchal sexuality. Isn’t this what all the fantasies aim at? But when it is done in real life, it is not a woman using whips and chains to force the man into a delightful servitude. It is an everyday life of male service and obedience to female authority. That sounds boring, but as you and many other bloogers demonstrate, these everyday acts stimulate a constant low intensity sexual arousal or satisfaction. It’s the satisfaction of shedding the patriarchal ego, of continually reaffirming female authority over oneself, and of worshipping and being “ridden” by a more powerful force and in that way participating in its triumph.
That’s the possibility anyway. From reading your blog something like this has occurred in your own journey. Am I right? It has in mine.
ls
So much to comment on here.
DeleteI wouldn't put it in terms of an emergent matriarchal dynamic myself because I think this behavior has been around for at least 100 years in this country. This is why I gave the example I did from 70 years ago or so.
I see this activity as personal and not so political although enough personal experiences eventually mount up to a political movement.
Some men bristle at this activity. The girls generally laugh at them (behind their backs at least) or just ignore them.
The guys who play along get played with a lot. I mostly really enjoy it because I find it a form of harmless flirting. Some women are not so playful and are actually kind of mean spirited about all this and those women I kind of avoid and I figure they probably have some background there that has led them to want to hurt men probably justified. It's just not that I WANT to be their personal catharsis. (My own Queen is a different story. She can pretty much do as she pleases with me but knowing her own power, she is gentle with me and only makes me blush a little.)
So I would say that you should 'relax and enjoy it'. When girls or women decide to do this with you, IT IS a form of flirting to try to 'mildly control and humiliate you' and if you can be brave and laugh along everyone has a great time.